Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Peretz
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 13, 2004No. CIV.A.00-11981-PBSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
This case arises out of a $40 million financial fraud at Centennial Technologies, Inc. (“Centennial”). Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) charges pro se defendant Gilboa Peretz with aiding and abetting former Centennial CEO Emmanuel Pinez with the fraudulent reporting of $1 million in revenue for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 1996. Specifically, the Commission charges that Peretz aided and abetted Centennial’s financial fraud in violations of §§ 10(b) and 13(b)(2)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- IIT v. CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. H. Thomas FehnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Graham v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BengerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. DruffnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ApolantDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.