Legal Opinion

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Benger

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 10, 2010No. 09 CV 676PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), brought this action to enforce the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a et seq., and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a et seq., and for equitable relief in connection with allegedly fraudulent Regulation S securities offerings. 1 The SEC’s complaint categorizes the defendants into two primary categories: (1) the Distribution Agents — Stefan H. Benger (“Benger”), SHB Capital, Inc. (“SHB…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. KramerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  2. PHARMERICA CHICAGO, INC. v. MeiselsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nutmeg Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Laborers' Pension Fund v. Lake City Janitorial, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BengerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API