Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Apolant

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 31, 2006No. 2:04-cv-04199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This securities fraud action was originally brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against four persons, including the Defendant Stephen E. Apolant (“Apolant”), seeking an injunction, disgorgement of unlawful profits, and civil penalties. The ease arises out of an alleged fraudulent scheme to manipulate the price of the stock of a publicly traded company, Spectrum Brands Corp., (“Spectrum Brands”), in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In Re Giant Interactive Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009