Legal Opinion
Guardian Life Insurance v. Zimlich
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided January 30, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge McCandless
Affirming.
In this case no brief has been filed by appellant. The practice is firmly established by this court that “in the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked it will 'be presumed that no error's exist, and that the judgment is correct.” Spradlin v. Spradlin, 170 Ky. 297; Commonwealth v. L. & E. Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 442; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Continental Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Spradlin v. SpradlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Suter v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Clay County v. First National Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hunt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928