Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Cope

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 20, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming on both original and cross appeal.

Neither party to this appeal has filed a brief. Therefore, under the well settled rule of this court, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed on both the original and cross appeal. Suter v. Christian, 199 Ky. 495, 251 S. W. 619; Guardian Life Insurance Co. v. Zimlich, 198 Ky. 616, 250 S. W. 139.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guardian Life Insurance v. ZimlichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Suter v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tartar v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Elsea v. DayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
  3. Clay County v. First National Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Huff v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API