Legal Opinion

Clay County v. First National Bank of Manchester

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 17, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzm'an

Affirming.

Although joining in with the appellee’s motion to advance this case, appellant has filed no brief in support of its appeal. Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal on many grounds, none of which we need at this time consider, as the practice is firmly established that, in the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist and the judgment is correct. Suter v. Christian, 199 Ky. 495, 251 S. W. 619; Guardian Life Insurance Co. v. Zimlich, 198 Ky. 616, 250 S. W. 139; Cochran v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Guardian Life Insurance v. ZimlichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Suter v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Faulkner Faulkner v. Wakenva Coal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API