Legal Opinion

Suter v. Christian

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice. Sampson—

Affirming.

As neither appellant nor appellee has filed a brief on ¿his appeal, this court under a well established rule can do nothing but affirm the judgment. Guardian Life Insurance Company v. Zimlick, 198 Ky. 616; Spradlin v. Spradlin, et al., 170 Ky. 297; Commonwealth v. L. & E. R. R. Co., 167 Ky. 442; Continential Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Continental Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Guardian Life Insurance v. ZimlichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Clay County v. First National Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Huff v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928