Legal Opinion
Suter v. Christian
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice. Sampson—
Affirming.
As neither appellant nor appellee has filed a brief on ¿his appeal, this court under a well established rule can do nothing but affirm the judgment. Guardian Life Insurance Company v. Zimlick, 198 Ky. 616; Spradlin v. Spradlin, et al., 170 Ky. 297; Commonwealth v. L. & E. R. R. Co., 167 Ky. 442; Continential Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Continental Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Guardian Life Insurance v. ZimlichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cochran v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Clay County v. First National Bank of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Huff v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928