Legal Opinion

Spradlin v. Spradlin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 19, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION. OF THE COURT BY

WlLLIAM ROGERS CLAY, Commissioneb,

Affirming.

In this ease no brief has been filed by appellant. In the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist, and that the judgment is correct. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 422, 180 S. W. 532; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441, 169 S. W. 855; Crawford v. Wiedemann, 158 Ky, 333, 164 S. W. 981; Brown v. Daniels, 154 Ky. 267, 157 S. W. 3.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Continental Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Crawford v. WiedemannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Travelers Insurance Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guardian Life Insurance v. ZimlichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Hunt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Whitt v. Pikeville National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928