Legal Opinion

Kurn v. Counts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1945No. 6 Div. 295PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action under the homicide statute (section 123, Title 7, Code of 1940) for negligently or wantonly causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate: counts one and two for negligence, three and four for wantonness. The defendants were two trustees of the St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, and Walter Connell. All the counts allege in different language that defendants were engaged in operating railroad trains as a business; and in counts one, three and four that the servants, agents or employees of defendants caused plaintiff’s intestate’s death;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. United States H. & A. Ins. v. GoinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Buckalew v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Airheart v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Edmondson v. BlakeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API