Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Dollar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant driver of an automobile on a highway and his insurer to recover for injuries sustained when his wagon, through negligence of the insured, was struck from behind by the automobile.

After first joining with the insured in an answer merely denying the insured's negligence and denying liability on that ground, the insurer obtained leave of court, upon notice and supporting affidavits, to file a “supplemental answer” in which it denies liability under the policy on the grounds that the insured violated his contract of insurance, (a) by making a false and untrue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Buckner v. BucknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Oertel v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bergstein v. PopkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bachhuber v. BoosalisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dennis and Rose Verhein v. South Bend Lathe, Inc. And Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. Valladao v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Kurz v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API