Seeger v. Young
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to determine adverse claims. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who made findings and ordered that the action be dismissed because of the pendency of a former action. From tbe judgment of dismissal, entered pursuant to tbe order, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. BeowN, J.
Action to determine adverse claims to four lots in -St. Paul. Defendant Young answered, setting up tbe pendency of a former action for tbe same cause, and alleging ownership in berself. Tbe trial •court sustained tbe defense of former action pending, and dismissed tbe case. Plaintiff moved for findings on tbe merits. Tbe motion was denied, and judgment of dismissal entered. Plaintiff appealed.
Plaintiff contends: (1) Tbat there was no evidence to sustain tbe finding tbat tbe former action, which was a proceeding by Young to register her title under tbe Torrens Act, was ever instituted; (2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Stephens v. Monongahela BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Smith v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Phelps v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Mitchell v. BazilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- McCormick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Hiller v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- United Sanders Stores, Inc. v. MessickArizona Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.