Legal Opinion

Barber v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Summary proceedings to recover the possession of leased prfemises for non-payment of rent. Complainant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainant leased the premises in-controversy to the defendant, the rent being payable-monthly in advance on the 1st day of each month. On September 1, 1892, the rent was not paid, and there was-also a dispute of $4.50, which the circuit judge has determined to have been due and unpaid for back rent. The sum of $11.50 was therefore due and payable on September 1. On September ,2, the complainant served the statutory notice to quit or pay the rent, and on the-same day he was paid and received the sum of $8.50. It is apparent that this paid the back rent, and left $4 'lobe applied upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conway v. StarkweatherCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. Jackson ex dem. Blanchard v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1824

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krell v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Edwards v. WirtzOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Electric Park Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Aspen Enterprises, Ltd v. BrayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API