Camp v. Scott
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Covenant and assumpsit; brought to the Superior Court in . New Haven County. Facts found and the case reserved for ' advice. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. ”
1Opinion of the Court
Loomis, «L
This action was brought to recover rent claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff by virtue of the following facts:
One Julius Hotchkiss by written instrument in due form leased certain premises to the plaintiff for ten years from the 1st of January, 1868, with covenants (among other things) to pay the rent quarterly on the first days of April, July, October, and January in each year, with a provision that the lease should terminate if the rent should remain unpaid thirty days after it was due, and giving the lessor the right to re-enter in the usual form. The lease also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conway v. StarkweatherCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Garnhart v. FinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Raymond v. SellickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
- Jerome v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Rosa v. CristinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Borst v. RuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Garland v. GainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.