Pendill v. Union Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.) Bill to remove cloud from title. Defendant company appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The bill in this case is filed by the complainants, who are the heirs of James P. Pendill, deceased, against the defendants, to remove a cloud from the title of some mining property described in the bill, situated in the county of Marquette, and to restrain by injunction the removal by the defendant of machinery from the mine, which had been previously leased to John Burt, with the land containing the same.
The mine had been opened and worked when the lease was given by Mr. Pendill and wife to Mr. Burt, which evidently contemplated the discovery of ore at other places on the leased land, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hyatt v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Low v. ElwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Stuyvesant v. DavisNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Jackson ex dem. Blanchard v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1824
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Merk v. Bowery Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Shannon v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Towle v. PullenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.