Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Electric Park Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Hon. Charles E. Pansier, Judge. Action for possession of land resulted in the dismissal of the petition. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Plaintiffs leased to defendant certain land to be used for an amusement park for a term of five years beginning February 1, 1908. The rental agreed upon was “$300 for the year 1908 and $350 per year thereafter, all payable on the first day of July of each year.” The lease provided that the premises should not be used for unlawful purposes under penalty of forfeiture at the election'of the lessor, and that, upon breach of any of the conditions therein, defendant without notice would surrender the same. The lessee failed to pay the rent July 1, 1909, and on August 21st following the lessor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Kenny v. Seu Si LunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Gomber v. HackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Barber v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Gudgel v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Faringer v. Van De HoefSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API