Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cty. Probate Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2001No. 2000-2238PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 160.] THE STATE EX REL. GOLDBERG, APPELLEE, v. MAHONING COUNTY PROBATE COURT ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cty. Probate Court, 2001-Ohio- 1297.] Probate court—Concealed or embezzled assets—R.C. 2109.50 to 2109.56 do not confer subject-matter jurisdiction on probate courts to issue prejudgment attachment orders relating to personal property—Prohibition—Writ sought to prohibit judge of common pleas court, probate division, from exercising further authority under his June 23, 2000…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Florence v. ZitterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Goldberg v. MaloneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. State v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Davic v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API