Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Corn v. Russo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2001No. 00-23PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This matter comes before this court upon the granting of a writ of prohibition that prohibits respondent from conducting further contempt proceedings in the underlying personal injury lawsuit entitled Crow v. Dotson, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CV345899. Since we find that respondent had jurisdiction to conduct criminal contempt proceedings, we reverse the court of appeals and deny the writ of prohibition.

This action arises from a subpoena issued to relators, Robert C. Corn, M.D., and Highland Musculo-Skeletal Associates, Inc., requesting financial information and related…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ohio High School Athletic Assn. v. Ruehlman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Liming v. DamosOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning County Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2001

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API