Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2006No. 2006-0250PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment granting a writ of prohibition to prevent a probate judge from proceeding in a concealment action instituted under R.C. 2109.50. Because the probate judge does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to proceed in the concealment case, we reverse.

Kish Concealment Action: 1999-2000

{¶ 2} On October 29, 1999, James B. Dietz, in his capacity as guardian of the estate of Michael James Kish (“Kish”), filed a complaint pursuant to R.C. 2109.50 in the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, for concealment of assets…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. United States Steel Corp. v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Lewis v. MoserOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning County Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mason v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mancz v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Lance v. BoldmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. Hamilton County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Cartwright v. BatnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API