Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State v. Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 2003-0447PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

The DeRolph Litigation: DeRolph I, II, III, and IV

{¶ 1} In December 1991, Dale R. DeRolph and other plaintiffs, including five school district boards of education, filed a complaint in respondent Perry County Court of Common Pleas. In an amended complaint, the DeRolph plaintiffs requested (1) a declaration that public education is a fundamental constitutional right in Ohio, (2) a declaration that the system of funding public education in Ohio was unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs and others, and (3) a mandatory injunction requiring relator, the state of Ohio, to provide for a system…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Egan v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Mason v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Russo v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Cleveland v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API