Legal Opinion

McKinley v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1933No. 28,992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIBELL, Justice.

Action to have a cancelation of a contract for the sale of land pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 9576, as amended, 2 Mason, 1927, id., by the giving of 30 days’ notice, adjudged inoperative and void for the reason that the contract Avas but the continuation of a prior mortgage given to the state pursuant to the provisions of the rural credits statute, 1 Mason, 1927, § 6030, et seq; that the right of the OAvner under the contract could be terminated only by the usual foreclosure sale Avith a year’s right of redemption; and to enjoin the defendants from interfering Avith plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Lundberg v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Holien v. SleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Westberg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. De Lancey v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCall v. CarlsonNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. O'Connor v. SchwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API