Legal Opinion

De Lancey v. Finnegan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1902No. Nos. 12,899-(62)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Stevens county, dismissing the action, entered pursuant to an order of Flaherty, J. cited: 2 Bigelow, Fraud, 125-127, 191, 196; Oh S. 1894, §§ 4280, 4281; Eogers v. McCauley, 22 Minn. 384; Matthews v. Torinus, 22 Minn. 132; Wolford y. Farnham, 44 Minn. 159; Ladd v. Newell, 34 Minn. 107; Welch v. Bradley, 45 Minn. 540; Minneapolis Stock Yards & Packing Co. v. Halonen, 56 Minn. 469; 1 G-reenleaf, Ev.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Stevens county, dismissing the action, entered pursuant to an order of Flaherty, J. cited: 2 Bigelow, Fraud, 125-127, 191, 196; Oh S. 1894, §§ 4280, 4281; Eogers v. McCauley, 22 Minn. 384; Matthews v. Torinus, 22 Minn. 132; Wolford y. Farnham, 44 Minn. 159; Ladd v. Newell, 34 Minn. 107; Welch v. Bradley, 45 Minn. 540; Minneapolis Stock Yards & Packing Co. v. Halonen, 56 Minn. 469; 1 G-reenleaf, Ev. (16th Ed.) § 284; Niggeler v. Maurin, 34 Minn. 118; King v. McCarthy, 50 Minn. 222, 225; Blakeley v. Le Due, 25 Minn. 448; Jones v'.…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action, in the nature of a creditor’s bill to subject to the payment of a certain judgment against the defendant M. F. Finnegan, and now owned by the plaintiff, six hundred eighty acres of land in the county of Stevens, the-record title whereof is in the defendant Mary Finnegan. The trial court dismissed the action at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Judgment was so entered, from which the plaintiff appealed.

The complaint alleges that in the year 1893 the defendant M. F. Finnegan was indebted to the First National Bank of Northfield, Minnesota, and on December 24, 1896, judgment for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Marshall v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aretz v. KloosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. O'Connor v. SchwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Grannis v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. McKinley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API