McCall v. Carlson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Horsey, J.:
The facts as proven by the evidence and upon the basis of which the questions to be determined on this appeal are predicated are substantially as follows:
On February 25, 1937, and prior thereto, the appellant, T. A. McCall, was the owner and in possession of 640 acres of land in Nye County, Nevada, being the same land described in paragraph IV of plaintiff’s complaint and which is the subject matter of this action. On the above-mentioned date, the appellant purchased some mining equipment of the respondents, and, to secure the payment of a balance in the sum of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Northern Illinois Coal Corp. v. CryderIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunt v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Shaner v. Rathdrum State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- ARC LifeMed, Inc. v. AMC-Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
- NAUTILUS INS. CO. VS. ACCESS MED., LLC (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- McNorton v. Pan American Bank of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.