Latham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. George B. Latham and Frank Flood were convicted for devising a fraudulent scheme for obtaining money, etc., by means of the post office, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
CALL, District Judge.
On January 24, 1914, George B. Latham, Prank .Flood, and J. H. Terrill were, in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, indicted in four counts, charged with devising a fraudulent scheme for obtaining money, etc., by means of the post office establishment of the United States, acting under the names of the Terrill Medical Institute and the New Method Treatment Company.
[1] On January 30, 1914, a motion to abate the indictment was made. This motion was denied, and subsequently a motion for continuance was granted Terrill, and Latham and Flood put on trial and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Jenkins v. North Carolina Ore Dressing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- United States v. HeinzeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- George E. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.