United States v. Heinze
District Court, S.D. New York
Fritz Augustus Hcinze was indicted for a criminal offense, and moves to quash the indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
This motion is based on numerous grounds, of which one only is to be considered in this memorandum; as to the rest, no opinion is expressed.
It appears from the affidavits filed and from admissions in open court that the United States attorney for this district desired, for the proper preparation and presentation of evidence in this prosecution, including proceedings before the grand jury, the assistance of an expert accountant. Owing to the nature of the case, such assistance was concededly both proper and necessary. The Attorney General was therefore requested to select…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1881
- United States v. CobbanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1904
- United States v. TwiningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Latham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.