United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Resourceful lawyers representing criminal defendants often desire to be thorough and to overlook nothing in their commendable zeal to afford first-class representation. Consequently in many cases they tend to excess as they inundate us with a plethora of arguments, some good and some not so good. Sometimes one wonders whether such lack of selectivity is not counterproductive, for a party raising a point of little merit exposes himself to the risk of excessive discount for a better point because of the company it keeps.
The present case raises numerous issues, but, in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph FennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.