Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Roderick

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 3, 1992No. 90-115PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Charles and Nancy Roderick, defendants, appeal from a superior court judgment awarding plaintiffs, Susan MacDonald and Thomas Smith, a real estate sales commission. Defendants allege that plaintiffs fraudulently induced them to enter into a listing agreement with them. They further claim that because the listing agreement violated certain rules of the Vermont Real Estate Commission, it cannot be used to require them to pay a commission. We affirm.

Plaintiffs are real estate brokers who do business through a partnership called Century 21 Select Realty. In 1988, they employed Michael Griffin as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Currier v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  4. Hossan v. HudiakoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. O'BRIEN v. Island Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. White Current Corp. v. Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Wyoming Realty Co. v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hardwick-Morrison Co. v. AlbertssonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API