Legal Opinion
Hardwick-Morrison Co. v. Albertsson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 28, 1992No. 90-079PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Defendant Stig Albertsson appeals a jury award of the balance due, plus interest, on pumping equipment plaintiff sold to Albertsson-Hunter Corporation, a company controlled by defendant. The jury found defendant Albertsson personally liable for the corporation’s debt. We affirm.
I
At all times material, Albertsson-Hunter Corporation was in the business of selling water slides to amusement parks and recreation areas. It was owned by Albertsson Corporation, a holding company owned by defendant and his wife. Albertsson Corporation provided administrative services for AlbertssonHunter and four…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ass'n of Haystack Property Owners, Inc. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Center v. Mad River Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Proctor Trust Co. v. Upper Valley Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Contractor's Crane Service, Inc. v. Vermont Whey Abatement AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Central Vermont Public Service Corporation v. Harold Herbert and Edith HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Roy v. MugfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Gladstone v. Stuart Cinemas, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1993
- Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.