Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Golub Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 31, 1997No. 95-444PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant Golub Corporation * appeals from a $175,000 jury verdict finding that defendant had wrongfhlly discharged plaintiff, Marylu Haynes. Defendant raises four claims of error: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that plaintiff was fired without sufficient cause; (2) evidence regarding a promise to retransfer plaintiff to her backdoor receiver position was erroneously admitted; (3) the jury instructions on reducing damages for future wages to present value misled the jury and require a new trial on damages; and (4) the trial court erred in failing to grant a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. L'ESPERANCE v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Murphy v. Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API