Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issues raised by the plaintiffs upon appeal are the following:
1. Did the trial court properly instruct the jury as to informed consent?
2. Did the trial court err in applying the locality rule?
3. Did the jury return a valid five-sixths verdict?
*104. Did the trial court err in refusing to change the jury answers on causation from “No” to “Yes?”
5. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?
The trial court instructed the jury with respect to the issue of informed consent as follows:
“With respect to your answer to the question inquiring as to the negligence of Dr. Kamper, Question…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Largey v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.