Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 27, 1988No. 5975PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant appeals from a postjudgment ruling of the trial court in this dissolution action on a motion for clarification filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed a cross appeal from that same ruling. The defendant has also filed an amended appeal from the court’s order that he pay the plaintiff attorney’s fees on the appeal and cross appeal.

The issue which is dispositive of the defendant’s appeal is his claim that the trial court acted without jurisdiction in substantively modifying a lump sum alimony award.1 The sole issue raised by the defendant in his amended appeal is his claim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Holcombe v. HolcombeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Cattaneo v. CattaneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Draper v. DraperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API