Legal Opinion
Fred Gilligan Van Hardesty v. City of Emporia, Kansas, League of Kansas Municipalities, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1993No. 92-3217PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Gilligan and Hardesty brought a declaratory judgment action in the district court, seeking a ruling that mandatory “on-call” time which they spent in their employment with the City of Emporia, Kansas (the City), constituted compensable work hours under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and that they were therefore entitled to overtime compensation pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 207 (section 7 of the FLSA). 1 The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, and the district court granted the City’s motion, finding that plaintiffs were not entitled to overtime…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Missouri v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Reich v. Monfort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Landry v. Swire Oilfield Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- United Transportation Union Local 1745 v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Pabst v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Charlene Brigham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Brigham Carl Hall Gary Millsap Donald E. Reed v. Eugene Water & Electric BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.