Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1992No. Nos. 91-1274, 91-1342PublishedCited by 350 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) sought to recover overtime wages from their employer, Defendant-Appellee Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling (Wichita). Wichita denied any obligation to pay overtime, relying on the motor carrier exemption of the Act, § 13(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 213(b)(1). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Wichita, holding as a matter of law that (1) Plaintiffs performed duties that were involved in interstate commerce and (2) the Department of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Adams v. America Guarantee & Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Mary P. Durham v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.