Legal Opinion
Reich v. Monfort, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1998No. 96-1544, 97-1028PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor filed this action alleging that defendant Monfort, Inc., a meat processing company, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to compensate its employees for certain pre- and post-shift work activities. The district court found that defendant violated the FLSA, the violations were willful and thus subject to a three-year statute of limitations, and it ordered restitution and a permanent injunction. On appeal (No. 96-1544) defendant asserts that the district court erred in concluding that the de minimis exception did not apply…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared SchubinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Pabst v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Aguilar v. Management & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Anderson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.