Legal Opinion
State v. Vance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 18, 1970No. 52PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the instructions of the trial judge concerning the defendant’s wife’s testimony as an interested witness. In this connection, the trial judge charged:
“This defendant’s wife testified in the case. The court charges you that she is an interested witness; that she is interested in the outcome of your verdict. And so the court charges you that you should scrutinize and look carefully into her testimony. But that if after you have looked carefully into and scrutinized her testimony, you believe she is telling the truth about the matter, then you would…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. ShoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. EakinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.