Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Garrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1930No. Docket No. 7557PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSEN, J., pro tem.

The County of Alameda was granted an alternative writ of mandate on its petition to the Supreme Court of this state, directed to said defendants, as auditor and treasurer, respectively, of said county, commanding them to comply with the order of the board of supervisors of said county to charge and pay the expenditure represented by a certain warrant out of the “Estuary Bridge Bond Fund of Said County, ” or to show cause before this court why they had not done so.

Respondents answered the petition for the writ, and the matter has been submitted to this court on an agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Vail v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State School Building Finance Committee v. BettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. El Dorado Irrigation District v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. County of San Diego v. PerrigoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API