Legal Opinion
Artuso v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1996No. 95-30619PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
In this case, a federal prisoner alleges that regulations of the United States Parole Commission (USPC) are inconsistent with a congressional statute. We agree and grant the prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
I
This ease concerns a type of post-release supervision, special parole, that did not survive the advent of the sentencing guidelines. Under pre-guidelines law, certain offenses triggered a requirement that the defendant receive a term of special parole. This special parole term followed any imprisonment or normal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Raynell HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kevin Fowler v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Kent Evans v. United States Parole Commission, Jay Van Russell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Frederick Fillingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Steven Gregory Billis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William Barry Robinson, A/K/A BarryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.