Legal Opinion
United States v. Shaun K. O'Neil
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 15, 1993No. 93-1325PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Concluding, as we do, that several courts of appeals have read the supervised release revocation provision (SRR provision), 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (1988 & Supp. Ill 1991), in too crabbed a manner, we hold today that this statute permits a district court, in resentencing a person who has violated the conditions of his or her original term of supervised release, to impose a new term of supervised release in conjunction with an additional prison term, subject to certain restrictions limned in the statute itself. Because we are staking out a position at variance with the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Harold DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.