Legal Opinion

United States v. Raynell Holmes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-3624PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Raynell Holmes argues that when a district court revokes a term of supervised release he may not follow the prison sentence with service of the “remainder” of his initial period of supervised release. We agree, and reverse the judgment of the district court.

I

In November of 1988, Holmes pled guilty to one count of escape, which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of five years. 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). He was sentenced to two years incarceration and three years supervised release. He served his time in prison and was set free. Five months later and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Behrooz K. BehnezhadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Timothy Scott BolingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Timothy Tyrone RockwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Charles David SchraderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API