Jacobs v. Hoitt
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffiths, J., entered November 12, 1921, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on promissory notes and to subject property to the lien of a judgment, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
— The appellant loaned to the respondent Ralph H. Hoitt, $5,300, prior to October 1, 1918, and in this action recovered judgment upon the *284notes representing the loan. Balph H. Hoitt was married to the respondent Elizabeth Gr. Hoitt on December 3,1918. The loans by the appellant constituted separate debts of Balph H. Hoitt. The only question in the case before us is as to the collectibility of the appellant’s judgment from property which the respondents claim is community property, but which the appellant claims is the separate property of the husband.
The facts in regard to this property are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Volz v. ZangWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Finn v. FinnWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- In re the Estate of BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Tibbetts v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Laughlin v. LaughlinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.