Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Meeker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1929No. 21518. Department TwoPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, as husband and wife, to restrain the defendant from impounding, by writ of garnishment, community funds in satisfaction of a separate judgment against the husband. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law sustaining the prayer of the complaint. Judgment was entered restraining the defendant from tying up eom- munity funds in satisfaction of a separate obligation of the husband, from which judgment the defendant appeals.

The facts are these: Since the year 1925, the respondent G-. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. HoittWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In re the Estate of BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In Re Marriage of DekkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Pollock v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API