Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Chumbley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2003No. 72539-0PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

During her marriage to Gerald Chumbley, Mary Patricia Beckmann acquired stock options through her employment. Beckmann exercised the options on three occasions, once by using a loan from her employer, once by using money from her separate account, and once by selling a portion of the purchased stock in order to pay for the remaining stocks. The dispute here involves the characterization of the stocks resulting from the options exercised with Beckmann’s separate property. Chumbley contends that the stocks are community property, and Beckmann contends that the stocks are her separate property.

We…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dean v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mele v. Mele (In Re Mele)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. In Re Marriage of ChumbleyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Marriage of KileCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API