Legal Opinion
Rifkin v. Safenovitz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 30, 1944PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant a sum amounting to about $3500, claimed to be due under the terms of a receipt signed by the defendant, a copy of which was annexed to the complaint. It acknowledged that the defendant had received from the Ace Woolen Company $3675 “to be held in escrow” upon the terms stated in it; it recited that, “whereas” the company had been awarded a government contract for the manufacture of woolen textiles and “whereas Irving N. Rifkin is to render services to the Ace Woolen Company,” the defendant-agreed to pay Rifkin a sum equal to 3…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Byram Lumber & Supply Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Norwood Morris Plan Co. v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Cochrane v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Leventhal v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Rockwell v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Knapp v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Dowling v. KielakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.