Legal Opinion

Norwood Morris Plan Co. v. McCarthy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1936PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This action of contract based upon a promissory note was brought in a district court against the executor of one of the joint and several makers. Recovery is sought of the unpaid balance of $3,000 with interest, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee as provided in the note and alleged to be $225. The defendant seasonably claimed a trial by jury and caused the case to be removed to the Superior Court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 104. There the defendant filed an answer containing a general denial, plea of payment, an allegation of lack of consideration, and a denial of the genuineness of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Noyes v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Leventhal v. KrinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Kesler v. PritchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API