Legal Opinion
Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 9, 1967PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This is a negligence action wherein the named plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the question before this court is whether the action of the trial court was correct.
The complaint alleged the following facts: On April 11, 1960, the named plaintiff, hereinafter called the plaintiff, was employed by the New Haven Glass Company as a glazier and was engaged in installing glass windows in a building which was being constructed on premises owned by St. Stanislaus Church in New Haven. At the premises, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Pluhowsky v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.