Legal Opinion

Bismarck v. Inc. Village of Bayville

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for an order granting summary judgment as to. the second cause of action alleged in the complaint and severing the action as to the balance of the complaint. In the second cause of action, plaintiff attacks a resolution of the defendant Village Board, adopted March 29, 1963 reclassifying 60 acres owned by her, from Residence “ D ” zoning (15,000 square feet minimum lot requirement) to a Residence “ F ” District (40,000 square feet lot requirement) as invalid on the ground that the resolution was not passed by a three-fourths majority of the Board of Trustees as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Hamilton v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Rabasco v. Town of GreenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Kurlander v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jalowiec v. ReileNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. August v. City of Pompano Beach, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1966
  4. Kernick v. Penn Hills TownshipAllegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API