Legal Opinion

Kernick v. Penn Hills Township

Allegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided June 5, 1964No. 109Published

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, P. J.,

This court believes that the statement of facts as set out in the brief on behalf of the Township of Penn Hills is very complete and the court adopts the same and it is as follows:

“The parties have stipulated to most if not all of the essential facts involved in this case. The following brief summary of these facts is based on the stipulation and Exhibits thereto and on the plaintiffs’ complaint.
“In this proceeding, initiated under section 1502 of the First Class Township Code Act of June 24, 1931, P. L. 1206, art. XV, sec. 1502, cl. I, II, as amended, 53 PS §56502, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Los Angeles Lighting Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Williams Et Ux. v. Barbaretta Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API