Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. . Wright

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1868PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The general rule, that an appearance by attorney, whether for the plaintiff or the defendant, if there be no collusion, may be recognized by the adverse party as authentic and valid, I deem important to the safe administration of justice, and well founded in the scheme and plan of such administration in England and this country ever since such officers were commissioned to represent litigants in the courts.

Receiving their authority from the court, they are deemed its officers. Their commissions declare them entitled to confidence, and, in a just sense, their license is an assurance, not only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Jackson ex dem. Lathrop v. DemontNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Jackson ex dem. Smith v. StewarthNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Jackson ex dem. Youngs v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  5. Bean v. MatherNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Skyline Agency, Inc. v. Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Williams v. . BarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Brown v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API