Legal Opinion
Doe v. Kuriansky
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael J. Garson, J.
Petitioner1 moves to quash a Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum served upon him as operator of "John Doe Home for Adults” on the following grounds: (a) the respondent Deputy Attorney-General does not have "jurisdiction” to investigate adult homes; (b) the letters authorizing the Attorney-General to investigate the private proprietary homes for adults (hereinafter referred to as PPHA) industry are stale; and (c) respondent’s office has become impermissibly independent from the Attorney-General’s office.
The court has considered petitioner’s moving papers…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGuire v. Forest Avenue Grocery, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998
- McGuire v. Forest Avenue Grocery, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998