Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Musim
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 1, 1967No. 21445PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton
C.R.S. 1963, 41-3-1, formerly C.R.S. ’53, 41-3-1, involved in this action reads as follows:
“Civil causes abolished. — All civil causes of action for breach of promise to marry, alienation of affections, criminal conversation and seduction are heréby abolished.”
Rosamond Goldberg, plaintiff in error and plaintiff in the trial court, filed her amended complaint entitled “Damages for Impairment of Contract” on February 21, 1964, alleging as follows:
“I.
“The plaintiff and Harry H. Goldberg are husband and wife, having been married at Raton, New Mexico, on October 30, 1945; the plaintiff having…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Cason v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Pickett v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Yarbro v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.