Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Petition to rehear this case, reported in 130 N. C., 313. Petition allowed.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This case is before us the third time, upon a petition to rehear and revise the former judgment of this court, rendered at February term, 1902, affirming the judgment of the court below, which was adverse to the plaintiff. The case is reported in 124 N. C., 302, and 130 N. C., 313.
We think it is necessary to refer to only three of the exceptions taken by the plaintiff at the trial. The plaintiff proposed to ask a witness the following question: “If this plank on the apron bad been sound and not cedar-bearted or rotten, could a man of Cogdell’s weight and size have stood on it with safety and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Whitehurst v. . HarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
3Cited by61 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.